Completely satisfied the elephant isn’t an individual, New York courtroom says

New York’s highest courtroom dominated that an elephant on the Bronx Zoo isn’t a “particular person” and that the civil rights group combating for her launch to a sanctuary isn’t entitled to take action on her behalf.

The Nonhuman Rights Undertaking had argued that the elephant, named Completely satisfied, was being illegally confined on the zoo and sought to have her moved to an elephant sanctuary.

The courtroom dispute centred on whether or not the authorized precept of habeas corpus – which guards towards unlawful detention – must be prolonged to emotionally advanced and clever animals.

The courtroom finally dominated that elephants, whereas being “spectacular”, are usually not entitled to the identical liberty rights as people.


Comments are closed.